VP5 and the N terminus of VP2 are not responsible for the different pathotype of serotype I and II infectious bursal disease virus

References

1. Bayliss C. D., Spies U., Shaw K., Peters R. W., Papageorgiou A., Müller H., Boursnell M. E. G. 1990; A comparison of the sequences of segment A of four infectious bursal disease virus strains and identification of a variable region in VP2. Journal of General Virology 71:1303–1312
   [Google Scholar]
2. Birghan C., Mundt E., Gorbalenya A. 2000; A non-canonical Lon proteinase deficient of the ATPase domain employs the Ser–Lys catalytic dyad to impose broad control over the life cycle of a double-stranded RNA virus. EMBO Journal 19:114–123
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cosgrove A. S. 1962; An apparently new disease of chickens – avian nephrosis. Avian Diseases 6:385–389
   [Google Scholar]
4. Hudson P. J., McKern N. M., Power B. E., Azad A. A. 1986; Genomic structure of the large RNA segment of infectious bursal disease virus. Nucleic Acids Research 14:5001–5012
   [Google Scholar]
5. Hirai K., Calnek B. W. 1979; In vitro replication of infectious bursal disease virus in established lymphoid cell lines and chicken B lymphocytes. Infection and Immunity 25:964–970
   [Google Scholar]
6. Ismail N. M., Saif Y. M., Moorhead P. D. 1988; Lack of pathogenicity of five serotype 2 infectious bursal disease viruses in chickens. Avian Diseases 32:757–759
   [Google Scholar]
7. Jackwood D. J., Saif Y. M., Hughes J. H. 1982; Characteristics and serologic studies of two serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus in turkey. Avian Diseases 26:871–882
   [Google Scholar]
8. Jeurissen S. H. M., Janse E. M., Koch G., De Boe G. F. 1988; The monoclonal antibody CVI-ChNL-68.1 recognizes cells of the monocyte–macrophage lineage in chickens. Developmental and Comparative Immunology 12:855–864
   [Google Scholar]
9. Lui X., Giambrone J. J., Hoerr F. J. 2000; In situ hybridization, immunohistochemistry, and in situ reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction for detection of infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Diseases 44:161–169
   [Google Scholar]
10. McFerran J. B., McNulty M. S., Killop E. R., Connor T. J., McCracken R. M., Collins P. S., Allan G. M. 1980; Isolation and serological studies with infectious bursal disease virus from fowl, turkeys and ducks: demonstration of a second serotype. Avian Pathology 9:395–404
    [Google Scholar]
11. Mundt E. 1999; Tissue culture infectivity of different strains of infectious bursal disease virus is determined by distinct amino acids in VP2. Journal of General Virology 80:2067–2076
    [Google Scholar]
12. Mundt E., Müller H. 1995; Complete nucleotide sequences of 5′- and 3′-noncoding regions of both genome segments of different strains of infectious bursal disease virus. Virology 209:209–218
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mundt E., Vakharia V. N. 1996; Synthetic transcripts of double-stranded birnavirus genome are infectious. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93:11131–11136
    [Google Scholar]
14. Mundt E., Beyer J., Müller H. 1995; Identification of a novel viral protein in infectious bursal disease virus-infected cells. Journal of General Virology 76:437–443
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mundt E., Köllner B., Kretzschmar D. 1997; VP5 of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is not essential for viral replication in cell culture. Journal of Virology 71:5647–5651
    [Google Scholar]
16. Murphy F. A., Fauquet C. M., Bishop D. H. L., Ghabrial S. A., Jarvis A. W., Martelli G. P., Mayo M. A., Summers M. D. (editors) 1995; Virus Taxonomy. Sixth Report of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Vienna & New York: Springer-Verlag;
    [Google Scholar]
17. Nieper H., Müller H. 1996; Susceptibility of chicken lymphoid cells to infectious bursal disease virus does not correlate with the presence of specific binding sites. Journal of General Virology 77:1229–1237
    [Google Scholar]
18. Nieper H., Teifke J. P., Jungmann A., Löhr C. V., Müller H. 1999; Infected and apoptotic cells in the IBDV-infected bursa of Fabricius, studied by double-labelling techniques. Avian Pathology 28:279–285
    [Google Scholar]
19. Öppling V., Müller H., Becht H. 1991; The structural polypeptide VP3 of infectious bursal disease virus carries group- and serotype-specific epitopes. Journal of General Virology 72:2275–2278
    [Google Scholar]
20. Rothwell C. J., Vervelde L., Davison T. F. 1996; Identification of chicken Bu-1 alloantigens using the monoclonal antibody AV20. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 55:225–234
    [Google Scholar]
21. Schröder A., van Loon A. A. W. M., Goovaerts D., Mundt E. 2000; Chimeras in noncoding regions between serotype I and II of segment A of infectious bursal disease virus are viable and show pathogenic phenotype in chickens. Journal of General Virology 81:533–540
    [Google Scholar]
22. Spies U., Müller H., Becht H. 1987; Properties of RNA polymerase activity associated with infectious bursal disease virus and characterization of its reaction products. Virus Research 8:127–140
    [Google Scholar]
23. Spies U., Müller H., Becht H. 1989; Nucleotide sequence of infectious bursal disease virus segment A delineates two major open reading frames. Nucleic Acids Research 17:7982
    [Google Scholar]
24. Teifke J. P., Löhr C. V., Shirasawa H. 1998; Detection of canine oral papillomavirus (COPV)-DNA in canine oral squamous cell carcinomas and p53 overexpressing skin papillomas of the dog using the polymerase chain reaction and nonradioactive in situ hybridization. Veterinary Microbiology 60:119–130
    [Google Scholar]
25. Teifke J. P., Löhr C. V., Marschang R. E., Osterrieder N., Posthaus H. 2000; Detection of chelonid herpesvirus DNA by nonradioactive in situ hybridization in tissues from tortoises suffering from stomatitis–rhinitis-complex in Europe and North America. Veterinary Pathology 37: (in press
    [Google Scholar]
26. Yao K., Goodwin M. A., Vakharia V. N. 1998; Generation of a mutant infectious bursal disease virus that does not cause bursal lesions. Journal of Virology 72:2647–2657
    [Google Scholar]