1887

Abstract

The cleavage and packaging of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) genome is accomplished by the viral terminase, comprising pUL56 and pUL89, and the recently identified pUL51 subunit. Since knowledge about pUL51 is scarce, we aimed at identifying pUL51 domains that are important for terminase assembly. analysis suggested that the N-terminal half of pUL51 is intrinsically disordered, and that α-helices are present in the C-terminal part. Linker-scanning mutagenesis of pUL51 in the context of the viral genome revealed that amino acid insertions into the predicted α-helices are not compatible with viral growth, whereas upon mutagenesis of the putatively disordered parts interaction with pUL56 and pUL89 was retained and viral progeny was produced. Replacement of pUL51 with the closely related M51 protein of mouse cytomegalovirus did not lead to viable virus, indicating that M51 cannot substitute for pUL51, and swapping the M51 and UL51 N- and C-termini demonstrated the critical role of the pUL51 C-terminal part in building the terminase complex. Notably, the pUL51 C-terminus alone turned out to be sufficient to enable terminase assembly, its nuclear localization and plaque formation. Using HCMV mutants expressing differently tagged pUL51 versions, we did not detect oligomerization of pUL51, as has been proposed for the pUL51 orthologues of other herpesviruses. These data provide an insight into the interaction of pUL51 with the other two terminase components, and provide the basis for unravelling the mode of action of novel antiviral drugs targeting the HCMV terminase.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000984
2018-01-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/99/1/119.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000984&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Mocarski ES, Shenk T, Griffiths PD, Pass RF. Cytomegaloviruses. In Knipe DM, Howley PM. (editors) Fields' Virology, 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2013 pp. 1960–2014
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kotton CN. CMV: prevention, diagnosis and therapy. Am J Transplant 2013; 13:24–40 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Biron KK. Antiviral drugs for cytomegalovirus diseases. Antiviral Res 2006; 71:154–163 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Lischka P, Zimmermann H. Antiviral strategies to combat cytomegalovirus infections in transplant recipients. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2008; 8:541–548 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bogner E. Human cytomegalovirus terminase as a target for antiviral chemotherapy. Rev Med Virol 2002; 12:115–127 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Visalli RJ, van Zeijl M. DNA encapsidation as a target for anti-herpesvirus drug therapy. Antiviral Res 2003; 59:73–87 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Baines JD. Herpes simplex virus capsid assembly and DNA packaging: a present and future antiviral drug target. Trends Microbiol 2011; 19:606–613 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Melendez DP, Razonable RR. Letermovir and inhibitors of the terminase complex: a promising new class of investigational antiviral drugs against human cytomegalovirus. Infect Drug Resist 2015; 8:269–277 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Pi F, Zhao Z, Chelikani V, Yoder K, Kvaratskhelia M et al. Development of potent antiviral drugs inspired by viral hexameric DNA-packaging motors with revolving mechanism. J Virol 2016; 90:8036–8046 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Wang Y, Mao L, Kankanala J, Wang Z, Geraghty RJ. Inhibition of human cytomegalovirus pUL89 terminase subunit blocks virus replication and genome cleavage. J Virol 2017; 91:e02152-16 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Stoelben S, Arns W, Renders L, Hummel J, Mühlfeld A et al. Preemptive treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients with letermovir: results of a phase 2a study. Transpl Int 2014; 27:77–86 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chemaly RF, Ullmann AJ, Stoelben S, Richard MP, Bornhäuser M et al. Letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2014; 370:1781–1789 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Fuji S, Einsele H, Kapp M. Cytomegalovirus disease in hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients: current and future therapeutic options. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2017; 30:372–376 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bowman LJ, Melaragno JI, Brennan DC. Letermovir for the management of cytomegalovirus infection. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2017; 26:235–241 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Merck Sharp & Dohme Merck announces pivotal phase 3 study of Letermovir, an investigational antiviral medicine for prevention of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in high-risk bone marrow transplant patients, met primary endpoint; 2016 www.mercknewsroom.com/news-release/corporate-news/merck-announces-pivotal-phase-3-study-letermovir-investigational-antivir
  16. Goldner T, Hewlett G, Ettischer N, Ruebsamen-Schaeff H, Zimmermann H et al. The novel anticytomegalovirus compound AIC246 (Letermovir) inhibits human cytomegalovirus replication through a specific antiviral mechanism that involves the viral terminase. J Virol 2011; 85:10884–10893 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Goldner T, Hempel C, Ruebsamen-Schaeff H, Zimmermann H, Lischka P. Geno- and phenotypic characterization of human cytomegalovirus mutants selected in vitro after letermovir (AIC246) exposure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014; 58:610–613 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Chou S. Rapid in vitro evolution of human cytomegalovirus UL56 mutations that confer letermovir resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59:6588–6593 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Walker JE, Saraste M, Runswick MJ, Gay NJ. Distantly related sequences in the alpha- and beta-subunits of ATP synthase, myosin, kinases and other ATP-requiring enzymes and a common nucleotide binding fold. Embo J 1982; 1:945–951[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Champier G, Hantz S, Couvreux A, Stuppfler S, Mazeron MC et al. New functional domains of human cytomegalovirus pUL89 predicted by sequence analysis and three-dimensional modelling of the catalytic site DEXDc. Antivir Ther 2007; 12:217–232[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang JB, Mcvoy MA. Mutagenesis of the murine cytomegalovirus M56 terminase gene. J Gen Virol 2008; 89:2864–2868 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Scheffczik H, Savva CG, Holzenburg A, Kolesnikova L, Bogner E. The terminase subunits pUL56 and pUL89 of human cytomegalovirus are DNA-metabolizing proteins with toroidal structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:1695–1703 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Nadal M, Mas PJ, Mas PJ, Blanco AG, Arnan C et al. Structure and inhibition of herpesvirus DNA packaging terminase nuclease domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:16078–16083 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hwang JS, Bogner E. ATPase activity of the terminase subunit pUL56 of human cytomegalovirus. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:6943–6948 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Scholz B, Rechter S, Drach JC, Townsend LB, Bogner E. Identification of the ATP-binding site in the terminase subunit pUL56 of human cytomegalovirus. Nucleic Acids Res 2003; 31:1426–1433 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Bogner E, Radsak K, Stinski MF. The gene product of human cytomegalovirus open reading frame UL56 binds the pac motif and has specific nuclease activity. J Virol 1998; 72:2259–2264[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dittmer A, Drach JC, Townsend LB, Fischer A, Bogner E. Interaction of the putative human cytomegalovirus portal protein pUL104 with the large terminase subunit pUL56 and its inhibition by benzimidazole-d-ribonucleosides. J Virol 2005; 79:14660–14667 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Borst EM, Kleine-Albers J, Gabaev I, Babic M, Wagner K et al. The human cytomegalovirus UL51 protein is essential for viral genome cleavage-packaging and interacts with the terminase subunits pUL56 and pUL89. J Virol 2013; 87:1720–1732 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Neuber S, Wagner K, Goldner T, Lischka P, Steinbrueck L et al. Mutual interplay between the human cytomegalovirus terminase subunits pUL51, pUL56, and pUL89 promotes terminase complex formation. J Virol 2017; 91:e02384-16 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Wang JB, Zhu Y, Mcvoy MA, Parris DS. Changes in subcellular localization reveal interactions between human cytomegalovirus terminase subunits. Virol J 2012; 9:315 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Thoma C, Borst E, Messerle M, Rieger M, Hwang JS et al. Identification of the interaction domain of the small terminase subunit pUL89 with the large subunit pUL56 of human cytomegalovirus. Biochemistry 2006; 45:8855–8863 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Ligat G, Jacquet C, Chou S, Couvreux A, Alain S et al. Identification of a short sequence in the HCMV terminase pUL56 essential for interaction with pUL89 subunit. Sci Rep 2017; 7:8796 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Glass M, Busche A, Wagner K, Messerle M, Borst EM. Conditional and reversible disruption of essential herpesvirus proteins. Nat Methods 2009; 6:577–579 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Elbasani E, Gabaev I, Steinbrück L, Messerle M, Borst EM. Analysis of essential viral gene functions after highly efficient adenofection of cells with cloned human cytomegalovirus genomes. Viruses 2014; 6:354–370 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Beilstein F, Higgs MR, Stow ND. Mutational analysis of the herpes simplex virus type 1 DNA packaging protein UL33. J Virol 2009; 83:8938–8945 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang K, Dang X, Baines JD. A domain of herpes simplex virus pUL33 required to release monomeric viral genomes from cleaved concatemeric DNA. J Virol 2017; 91:e00854-17 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Giesen K, Radsak K, Bogner E. The potential terminase subunit of human cytomegalovirus, pUL56, is translocated into the nucleus by its own nuclear localization signal and interacts with importin alpha. J Gen Virol 2000; 81:2231–2244 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Tompa P. Structure and Function of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 2010
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rieder FJ, Kastner MT, Hartl M, Puchinger MG, Schneider M et al. Human cytomegalovirus phosphoproteins are hypophosphorylated and intrinsically disordered. J Gen Virol 2017; 98:471–485 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Hegde ML, Tsutakawa SE, Hegde PM, Holthauzen LM, Li J et al. The disordered C-terminal domain of human DNA glycosylase NEIL1 contributes to its stability via intramolecular interactions. J Mol Biol 2013; 425:2359–2371 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Faust O, Bigman L, Friedler A. A role of disordered domains in regulating protein oligomerization and stability. Chem Commun 2014; 50:10797–10800 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Rotem-Bamberger S, Katz C, Friedler A. Regulation of ASPP2 interaction with p53 core domain by an intramolecular autoinhibitory mechanism. PLoS One 2013; 8:e58470 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Patil A, Nakamura H. Disordered domains and high surface charge confer hubs with the ability to interact with multiple proteins in interaction networks. FEBS Lett 2006; 580:2041–2045 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Uetz P, Dong YA, Zeretzke C, Atzler C, Baiker A et al. Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. Science 2006; 311:239–242 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Fossum E, Friedel CC, Rajagopala SV, Titz B, Baiker A et al. Evolutionarily conserved herpesviral protein interaction networks. PLoS Pathog 2009; 5:e1000570 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Vizoso Pinto MG, Pothineni VR, Haase R, Woidy M, Lotz-Havla AS et al. Varicella zoster virus ORF25 gene product: an essential hub protein linking encapsidation proteins and the nuclear egress complex. J Proteome Res 2011; 10:5374–5382 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Visalli RJ, Knepper J, Goshorn B, Vanover K, Burnside DM et al. Characterization of the Varicella-zoster virus ORF25 gene product: pORF25 interacts with multiple DNA encapsidation proteins. Virus Res 2009; 144:58–64 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Uversky VN. Multitude of binding modes attainable by intrinsically disordered proteins: a portrait gallery of disorder-based complexes. Chem Soc Rev 2011; 40:1623–1634 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Uversky VN. The multifaceted roles of intrinsic disorder in protein complexes. FEBS Lett 2015; 589:2498–2506 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Berlow RB, Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Functional advantages of dynamic protein disorder. FEBS Lett 2015; 589:2433–2440 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Dyson HJ. Making sense of intrinsically disordered proteins. Biophys J 2016; 110:1013–1016 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Heming JD, Huffman JB, Jones LM, Homa FL. Isolation and characterization of the herpes simplex virus 1 terminase complex. J Virol 2014; 88:225–236 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sun S, Gao S, Kondabagil K, Xiang Y, Rossmann MG et al. Structure and function of the small terminase component of the DNA packaging machine in T4-like bacteriophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012; 109:817–822 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Majerciak V, Pripuzova N, Chan C, Temkin N, Specht SI et al. Stability of structured Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus ORF57 protein is regulated by protein phosphorylation and homodimerization. J Virol 2015; 89:3256–3274 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tunnicliffe RB, Schacht M, Levy C, Jowitt TA, Sandri-Goldin RM et al. The structure of the folded domain from the signature multifunctional protein ICP27 from herpes simplex virus-1 reveals an intertwined dimer. Sci Rep 2015; 5:11234 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Visalli MA, House BL, Lahrman FJ, Visalli RJ. Intermolecular complementation between Two Varicella-Zoster virus pORF30 terminase domains essential for DNA encapsidation. J Virol 2015; 89:10010–10022 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Borst EM, Hahn G, Koszinowski UH, Messerle M. Cloning of the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) genome as an infectious bacterial artificial chromosome in Escherichia coli: a new approach for construction of HCMV mutants. J Virol 1999; 73:8320–8329[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Borst EM, Benkartek C, Messerle M. Use of bacterial artificial chromosomes in generating targeted mutations in human and mouse cytomegaloviruses. In Coligan JE, Bierer B, Margulies DH, Shevach EM, Strober W et al. (editors) Current Protocols in Immunology New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2007 pp. 10.32.1–10.3210
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Borst EM, Messerle M. Analysis of human cytomegalovirus oriLyt sequence requirements in the context of the viral genome. J Virol 2005; 79:3615–3626 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Wagner M, Jonjic S, Koszinowski UH, Messerle M. Systematic excision of vector sequences from the BAC-cloned herpesvirus genome during virus reconstitution. J Virol 1999; 73:7056–7060[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Tischer BK, Smith GA, Osterrieder N. En passant mutagenesis: a two step markerless red recombination system. Methods Mol Biol 2010; 634:421–430 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Borst EM, Bauerfeind R, Binz A, Stephan TM, Neuber S et al. The essential human cytomegalovirus proteins pUL77 and pUL93 are structural components necessary for viral genome encapsidation. J Virol 2016; 90:5860–5875 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Borst EM, Wagner K, Binz A, Sodeik B, Messerle M. The essential human cytomegalovirus gene UL52 is required for cleavage-packaging of the viral genome. J Virol 2008; 82:2065–2078 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Kim DE, Chivian D, Baker D. Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:W526–W531 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000984
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000984
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error