1887

Abstract

The differential response of 29 genotypes of tomato and wild tomato relatives ( section species) to cucumber mosaic virus strain Fny (CMV-Fny), alone or in combination with three different satellite RNA (satRNA) variants, allowed the identification of four disease phenotype patterns, each including plants that developed very severe symptoms (leaf malformations, top stunting and lethal necrosis) and plants that remained asymptomatic. No resistance or tolerance to CMV-Fny was observed, whilst individual host genotypes displayed latent infection upon inoculation with one (CMV-Fny/Tfn-satRNA, phenotype patterns 1 and 4), two (CMV-Fny/Tfn-satRNA and CMV-Fny/TTS-satRNA, phenotype pattern 2) or all three (the former two plus CMV-Fny/77-satRNA, phenotype pattern 3) CMV/satRNA combinations. RNA gel-blot analyses showed that latent infection generally correlated with a strong downregulation of CMV RNA accumulation levels. Introgression lines derived from a cross between LA1777, which displayed disease phenotype pattern 2, and were screened for tolerance to the stunting phenotype induced by CMV-Fny/TTS-satRNA, and only one line, carrying an introgression on chromosome 6, was identified as being partially tolerant. LA1932× back-cross introgression lines were screened for tolerance to lethal necrosis induced by CMV-Fny/77-satRNA (phenotype pattern 3); the tolerant phenotype was observed in 33 % of plants of the BCF progeny and <1 % of plants of the BCF progeny. Thus, potentially useful sources of tolerance to CMV/satRNA-induced diseases were identified, although the tolerant phenotypes appeared to be controlled by complex quantitative trait loci.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.83110-0
2007-11-01
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/88/11/3166.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.83110-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abad J., Anastasio G., Fraile A., García-Arenal F. 2000; A search for resistance to cucumber mosaic virus in the genus Lycopersicon . J Plant Pathol 82:39–48
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ciccarese F., Amenduni M., Cirulli M. 1987; Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) resistance in Lycopersicon species. In Proceedings of the 10th Meeting of the Eucarpia Tomato Working Group p– 41 Salerno, Italy:
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Cillo F., Barbarossa L., Grieco F., Gallitelli D. 1994; Lethal necrosis, fruit necrosis and top stunting: molecular-biological aspects of three cucumber mosaic virus-induced diseases of processing tomatoes in Italy. Acta Hortic 376:369–376
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cillo F., Finetti-Sialer M. M., Papanice M. A., Gallitelli D. 2004; Analysis of mechanisms involved in the cucumber mosaic virus satellite RNA-mediated transgenic resistance in tomato plants. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:98–108 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Collmer C. W., Howell S. H. 1992; Role of satellite RNA in the expression of symptoms caused by plant viruses. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:419–442 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Crescenzi A., Barbarossa L., Cillo F., Di Franco A., Vovlas N., Gallitelli D. 1993; Role of Cucumber mosaic virus and its satellite RNA in the etiology of tomato fruit necrosis in Italy. Arch Virol 131:321–333 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Escriu F., Fraile A., Garcia-Arenal F. 2000; Evolution of virulence in natural populations of the satellite RNA of cucumber mosaic virus. Phytopathology 90:480–485 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Gal-On A., Kaplan I., Roossinck M. J., Palukaitis P. 1994; The kinetics of infection of zucchini squash by Cucumber mosaic virus indicate a function for RNA 1 in virus movement. Virology 205:280–289 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gallitelli D. 1998; Present status of controlling cucumber mosaic virus. In Plant Virus Disease Control . pp 507–523 Edited by Hadidi A., Khetarpal R. H., Koganezawa H. St Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society Press;
  10. Gallitelli D. 2000; The ecology of cucumber mosaic virus and sustainable agriculture. Virus Res 71:9–21 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gallitelli D., Grieco F., Cillo F. 1997; The potential of a beneficial satellite RNA of cucumber mosaic cucumovirus to acquire deleterious functions: nature versus greenhouses. In Virus-Resistant Transgenic Plants: Potential Ecological Impact pp 100–106 Edited by Tepfer M., Balasz E. Berlin/Paris: Springer;
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Garcia-Arenal F., Palukaitis P. 1999; Structure and functional relationships of satellite RNAs of Cucumber mosaic virus. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 239:37–63
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gebré-Selassié K., Laterrot H., Marchoux G., Ragozzino A., Saccardo F. 1990; Resistance to potato virus Y and cucumber mosaic virus in Lycopersicon hirsutum . Rep Tomato Genet Coop 40:12–13
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Griffiths P. D., Scott J. W. 2001; Inheritance and linkage of tomato mottle virus resistance genes derived from Lycopersicon chilense accession LA 1932. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 126:462–467
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jacquemond M., Laterrot H. 1981; Comportement, vis à vis de la “Nécrose de la tomate”, des géniteurs utilisés pour la résistance au CMV. In Genetics and Breeding of Tomato: Proceedings of the Meeting of the Eucarpia Tomato Working Group pp 251–256 Avignon, France (in French
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Kaper J. M., Tousignant M. E. 1977; Cucumber mosaic virus-associated RNA 5. I. Role of host plant and helper strain in determining amount of associated RNA 5 with virions. Virology 80:186–195 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Kuriyama T., Kuniyasu K., Mochizuki H. 1971; Studies on the breeding of disease resistant tomato by interespecific hybridization. Bull Hortic Res Stn Ser B 11:33–60
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Laterrot H. 1980 In Rapport d'activité, 1979–1980 pp 110–111 Avignon, France: Station d'amélioration de plantes maraîchères d'Avignon;
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Laterrot H. 1990 In Rapport d'activité 1989–1990 pp 65–66 Avignon, France: Station d'amélioration de plantes maraîchères d'Avignon;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lecoq H., Moury B., Desbiez C., Palloix A., Pitrat M. 2004; Durable virus resistance in plants through conventional approaches: a challenge. Virus Res 100:31–39 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lot H., Marrou J., Quiot J. B., Esvan C. H. 1972; Contribution à l'étude du virus de la masaique du cocombre (CMV). II. Méthode rapide de purification du virus. Ann Phytopathol 4:25–38 (in French
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Marchoux G. 1990; Cucumber mosaic virus on tomato crops: strategies of research for the disease control. Acta Hortic 277:53–62
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Monforte A. J., Tanksley S. D. 2000; Development of a set of near isogenic and backcross recombinant inbred lines containing most of the Lycopersicon hirsutum genome in a L. esculentum genetic background: a tool for gene mapping and gene discovery. Genome 43:803–813 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Nitzany F. E. 1992; Cucumber mosaic virus in Israel. Phytopathol Med 14:16–20
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Owen J., Palukaitis P. 1988; Characterization of cucumber mosaic virus. I. Molecular heterogeneity mapping of RNA 3 in eight CMV strains. Virology 166:495–502 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Palukaitis P., Garcia-Arenal F. 2003; Cucumoviruses. Adv Virus Res 62:241–323
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Palukaitis P., Roossinck M. J., Dietzgen R. G., Francki R. I. 1992; Cucumber mosaic virus. Adv Virus Res 41:281–348
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Parrella G., Moretti A., Gognalons P., Lesage M.-L., Marchoux G., Gebre-Selassie K., Caranta C. 2004; The Am gene controlling resistance to Alfalfa mosaic virus in tomato is located in the cluster of dominant resistance genes on chromosome 6. Phytopathology 94:345–350 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Phills B. R., Provvidenti R., Robinson R. W. 1977; Reaction of Solanum lycopersicoides to viral diseases in the tomato. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 27:18
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Rizzo T. M., Palukaitis P. 1990; Construction of full-length cDNA clones of cucumber mosaic-virus RNAs 1, 2 and 3: generation of infectious RNA transcripts. Mol Gen Genet 222:249–256 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Sotirova V., Stoimenova E., Rodeva R. 1992; Sources of combined resistance in wild species of Lycopersicon . Genet Sel 25:38–44
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Stamova B. S., Chetelat R. T. 2000; Inheritance and genetic mapping of cucumber mosaic virus resistance introgressed from Lycopersicon chilense into tomato. Theor Appl Genet 101:527–537 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Stamova L., Christova D., Yordanov M. 1990; Resistance to cucumber mosaic virus. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 40:33
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Stoimenova E., Sotirova V. 1991; Resistance of tomato lines from the three-genome hybrid Lycopersicon esculentum - L. chilense - L.peruvianum var. humifusm to the cucumber mosaic virus (CMV). Rep Tomato Genet Coop 41, 54
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Stoimenova E., Sotirova V., Vulkova R. 1992; Sources of resistance to the cucumber mosaic virus in the genus Lycopersicon . C R Acad Bulg Sci 45:107–109
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Tien P., Wu G. 1991; Satellite RNA for the biocontrol of plant disease. Adv Virus Res 39:321–339
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Waterworth H. E., Kaper J. M., Tousignant M. E. 1979; CARNA 5, the small cucumber mosaic virus-dependent replicating RNA, regulates disease expression. Science 204:845–847 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Weber I., Haack I., Setlak B. 1989; Studies on the resistance of tomato to CMV: sources of resistance and criteria for evaluating resistance. Arch Phytopathol 25:215 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. White J. L., Kaper J. M. 1987; Absence of lethal stem necrosis in select Lycopersicon spp. infected by cucumber mosaic virus strain D and its necrogenic satellite CARNA 5. Phytopathology 77:808–811 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. White J. L., Kaper J. M. 1989; A simple method for detection of viral satellite RNAs in small plant tissue samples. J Virol Methods 23:83–94 [CrossRef]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Yasui H., Yamakawa K. 1978; Studies on the breeding of tomato plants for the resistance to tomato mosaic disease I: quantal assay on the resistance of tomato plant to cucumber mosaic virus. Bull Veg Ornamental Crops Res Stn 4:27–38
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.83110-0
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.83110-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error