1887

Abstract

Persistent propagative viruses maintain intricate interactions with their arthropod vectors. In this study, we investigated the transcriptome-level responses associated with a persistent propagative phytovirus infection in various life stages of its vector using an Illumina HiSeq sequencing platform. The pathosystem components included a , (TSWV), its insect vector, (Hinds), and a plant host, (L.). We assembled () reads from three developmental stage groups of virus-exposed and non-virus-exposed into one transcriptome consisting of 72 366 contigs and identified 1161 differentially expressed (DE) contigs. The number of DE contigs was greatest in adults (female) (562) when compared with larvae (first and second instars) (395) and pupae (pre- and pupae) (204). Upregulated contigs in virus-exposed thrips had annotations associated with intracellular transport and virus replication. Upregulated contigs were also assigned annotations associated with immune responses, including apoptosis and phagocytosis. In virus-exposed larvae, Blast2GO analysis identified functional groups, such as multicellular development with downregulated contigs, while reproduction, embryo development and growth were identified with upregulated contigs in virus-exposed adults. This study provides insights into differences in transcriptome-level responses modulated by TSWV in various life stages of an important vector, .

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000874
2017-08-01
2024-03-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/98/8/2156.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000874&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Belliure B, Janssen A, Maris PC, Peters D, Sabelis MW. Herbivore arthropods benefit from vectoring plant viruses. Ecol Lett 2005; 8:70–79 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Higashi CH, Bressan A. Influence of a propagative plant virus on the fitness and wing dimorphism of infected and exposed insect vectors. Oecologia 2013; 172:847–856 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Inoue T, Sakurai T. Infection of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) shortens the life span of thelytokous Thrips tabaci (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Appl Entomol Zool 2006; 41:239–246 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. van de Wetering F, Goldbach R, Peters D. Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus ingestion by first instar larvae of Frankliniella occidentalis is a prerequisite for transmission. Phytopathology 1996; 86:900–905 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Montero-Astúa M, Ullman DE, Whitfield AE. Salivary gland morphology, tissue tropism and the progression of tospovirus infection in Frankliniella occidentalis. Virology 2016; 493:39–51 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Moritz G, Kumm S, Mound L. Tospovirus transmission depends on thrips ontogeny. Virus Res 2004; 100:143–149 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Nagata T, Inoue-Nagata AK, Smid HM, Goldbach R, Peters D. Tissue tropism related to vector competence of Frankliniella occidentalis for tomato spotted wilt tospovirus. J Gen Virol 1999; 80:507–515 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Wijkamp I, Almarza N, Goldbach R, Peters D. Distinct levels of specificity in thrips transmission of tospoviruses. Phytopathology 1996; 85:1069–1074 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kormelink R, de Haan P, Meurs C, Peters D, Goldbach R. The nucleotide sequence of the M RNA segment of tomato spotted wilt virus, a bunyavirus with two ambisense RNA segments. J Gen Virol 1992; 73:2795–2804 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Maris PC, Joosten NN, Goldbach RW, Peters D. Tomato spotted wilt virus infection improves host suitability for its vector Frankliniella occidentalis. Phytopathology 2004; 94:706–711 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Mound LA. The Thysanoptera vector species of Tospovirus. Acta Hortic 1995; 431:298–309
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Shrestha A, Srinivasan R, Riley DG, Culbreath AK. Direct and indirect effects of a thrips-transmitted Tospovirus on the preference and fitness of its vector, Frankliniella fusca. Entomol Exp Appl 2012; 145:260–271 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Stumpf CF, Kennedy GG. Effects of tomato spotted wilt virus isolates, host plants, and temperature on survival, size, and development time of Frankliniella occidentalis. Entomol Exp Appl 2007; 123:139–147 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Ullman DE, Cho JJ, Maru RFL, Wescot DM, Custer DM. A midgut barrier to Tomato spotted Wilt virus acquisition by adult western flower thrips. Phytopathology 1992; 82:1333–1342 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Stafford CA, Walker GP, Ullman DE. Infection with a plant virus modifies vector feeding behavior. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108:9350–9355 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Robb KL. Analysis of Frankliniella Occidentalis (Pergande) as a Pest of Floriculture Thrips in California Greenhouse Ph.D. Dissertation, Riverside, CA University of California 1989
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Stumpf CF, Kennedy GG. Effects of tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) isolates, host plants, and temperature on survival, size, and development time of Frankliniella fusca. Entomol Exp Appl 2005; 114:215–225 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bautista RC, Rfl M, Cho JJ, Custer DM. Potential of Tomato spotted wilt tospovirus plant hosts in Hawaii as virus reservoirs for transmission by Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Phytopathology 1996; 85:953–958 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Medeiros RB, Resende RO, de Avila AC. The plant virus Tomato Spotted Wilt Tospovirus activates the immune system of its main insect vector, Frankliniella occidentalis. J Virol 2004; 78:4976–4982 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Schneweis DJ, Whitfield AE, Rotenberg D. Thrips developmental stage-specific transcriptome response to tomato spotted wilt virus during the virus infection cycle in Frankliniella occidentalis, the primary vector. Virology 2017; 500:226–237 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang Z, Zhang P, Li W, Zhang J, Huang F et al. De novo transcriptome sequencing in Frankliniella occidentalis to identify genes involved in plant virus transmission and insecticide resistance. Genomics 2013; 101:296–305 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Badillo-Vargas IE, Rotenberg D, Schneweis DJ, Hiromasa Y, Tomich JM et al. Proteomic analysis of Frankliniella occidentalis and differentially expressed proteins in response to tomato spotted wilt virus infection. J Virol 2012; 86:8793–8809 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Culbreath AK, Srinivasan R. Epidemiology of spotted wilt disease of peanut caused by Tomato spotted wilt virus in the southeastern US. Virus Res 2011; 159:101–109 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Culbreath AK, Todd JW, Brown SL. Epidemiology and management of tomato spotted wilt in peanut. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2003; 41:53–75 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Joost PH, Riley DG. Tomato plant and leaf age effects on the probing and settling behavior of Frankliniella fusca and Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Environ Entomol 2008; 37:213–223 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Marasigan K, Toews M, Kemerait R, Abney MR, Culbreath A et al. Evaluation of alternatives to carbamate and organophosphate insecticides against thrips and Tomato spotted wilt virus in peanut production. J Econ Entomol 2016; 109:544–557 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Riley DG, Batal K. Management of thrips on onions. In Maw BW. (editor) Georgia Onion Research-Extension Report. University of Georgia, Cooperative Research-Extension Publication No.398, June 1998 Tifton, GA: University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Coastal Plain Experiment Station; 1998 pp. 41–42
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Riley DG, Joseph SV, Srinivasan R, Diffie S. Thrips vectors of tospoviruses. J Integr Pest Manag 2011; 2:I1–I10 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rotenberg D, Jacobson AL, Schneweis DJ, Whitfield AE. Thrips transmission of tospoviruses. Curr Opin Virol 2015; 15:80–89 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jacobson AL, Kennedy GG. Specific insect-virus interactions are responsible for variation in competency of different Thrips tabaci isolines to transmit different Tomato spotted wilt virus isolates. PLoS One 2013; 8:e54567 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Radtke K, Döhner K, Sodeik B. Viral interactions with the cytoskeleton: a hitchhiker's guide to the cell. Cell Microbiol 2006; 8:387–400 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Simon M, Johansson C, Lundkvist A, Mirazimi A. Microtubule-dependent and microtubule-independent steps in Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus replication cycle. Virology 2009; 385:313–322 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Simpson-Holley M, Ellis D, Fisher D, Elton D, Mccauley J et al. A functional link between the actin cytoskeleton and lipid rafts during budding of filamentous influenza virions. Virology 2002; 301:212–225 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Taylor MP, Koyuncu OO, Enquist LW. Subversion of the actin cytoskeleton during viral infection. Nat Rev Microbiol 2011; 9:427–439 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Maynard ND, Gutschow MV, Birch EW, Covert MW. The virus as metabolic engineer. Biotechnol J 2010; 5:686–694 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Salzman NP, Lockart RZ, Sebring ED. Alterations in HeLa cell metabolism resulting from poliovirus infection. Virology 1959; 9:244–259 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Munger J, Bajad SU, Coller HA, Shenk T, Rabinowitz JD. Dynamics of the cellular metabolome during human cytomegalovirus infection. PLoS Pathog 2006; 2:e132 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Jin M, Park J, Lee S, Park B, Shin J et al. Hantaan virus enters cells by clathrin-dependent receptor-mediated endocytosis. Virology 2002; 294:60–69 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Pho MT, Ashok A, Atwood WJ. JC virus enters human glial cells by clathrin-dependent receptor-mediated endocytosis. J Virol 2000; 74:2288–2292 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Simon M, Johansson C, Mirazimi A. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus entry and replication is clathrin-, pH- and cholesterol-dependent. J Gen Virol 2009; 90:210–215 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Bonifacino JS, Lippincott-Schwartz J. Coat proteins: shaping membrane transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4:409–414 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Irving P, Troxler L, Heuer TS, Belvin M, Kopczynski C et al. A genome-wide analysis of immune responses in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:15119–15124 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang L, Tang N, Gao X, Guo D, Chang Z et al. Understanding the immune system architecture and transcriptome responses to southern rice black-streaked dwarf virus in Sogatella furcifera. Sci Rep 2016; 6:36254 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Washburn JO, Kirkpatrick BA, Volkman LE. Insect protection against viruses. Nature 1996; 383:767–769 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Griffin DE. Measles virus-induced suppression of immune responses. Immunol Rev 2011; 236:176–189 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Marshall HD, Urban SL, Welsh RM. Virus-induced transient immune suppression and the inhibition of T cell proliferation by type I interferon. J Virol 2011; 85:5929–5939 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lemaitre B, Nicolas E, Michaut L, Reichhart JM, Hoffmann JA. The dorsoventral regulatory gene cassette spätzle/Toll/cactus controls the potent antifungal response in Drosophila adults. Cell 1996; 86:973–983 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Jaskiewicz L, Filipowicz W. Role of Dicer in posttranscriptional RNA silencing. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2008; 320:77–97[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Arya R, Mallik M, Lakhotia SC. Heat shock genes-integrating cell survival and death. J Biosci 2007; 32:595–610 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Kim MY, Oglesbee M. Virus-heat shock protein interaction and a novel axis for innate antiviral immunity. Cells 2012; 1:646–666 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Nachappa P, Margolies DC, Nechols JR, Whitfield AE, Rotenberg D. Tomato spotted wilt virus benefits a non-vector arthropod, Tetranychus urticae, by modulating different plant responses in tomato. PLoS One 2013; 8:e75909 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rotenberg D, Whitfield AE. Analysis of expressed sequence tags for Frankliniella occidentalis, the western flower thrips. Insect Mol Biol 2010; 19:537–551 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Rowland D, Dorner J, Sorensen R, Beasley JP, Todd J. Tomato spotted wilt virus in peanut tissue types and physiological effects related to disease incidence and severity. Plant Pathol 2005; 54:431–440 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Munger F. A method for rearing citrus thrips in the laboratory. J Econ Entomol 1942; 35:373–375 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Shrestha A, Srinivasan R, Sundaraj S, Culbreath AK, Riley DG. Second generation peanut genotypes resistant to thrips-transmitted tomato spotted wilt virus exhibit tolerance rather than true resistance and differentially affect thrips fitness. J Econ Entomol 2013; 106:587–596 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Shrestha A, Sundaraj S, Culbreath AK, Riley DG, Abney MR et al. Effects of thrips density, mode of inoculation, and plant age on Tomato spotted wilt virus transmission in peanut plants. Environ Entomol 2015; 44:136–143 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Rotenberg D, Krishna Kumar NK, Ullman DE, Montero-Astúa M, Willis DK et al. Variation in Tomato spotted wilt virus titer in Frankliniella occidentalis and its association with frequency of transmission. Phytopathology 2009; 99:404–410 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014; 30:2114–2120 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Grabherr MG, Haas BJ, Yassour M, Levin JZ, Thompson DA et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29:644–652 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Parra G, Bradnam K, Ning Z, Keane T, Korf I. Assessing the gene space in draft genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:289–297 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Faino L, de Jonge R, Thomma BP. The transciptome of Verticillium dahliae-infected Nicotiana benthamiana determined by deep RNA sequencing. Intravital 2012; 7:1065–1069
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Nakasugi K, Crowhurst RN, Bally J, Wood CC, Hellens RP et al. De novo transcriptome sequence assembly and analysis of RNA silencing genes of Nicotiana benthamiana. PLoS One 2013; 8:e59534 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, Salzberg SL. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol 2009; 10:R25 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Robinson MD, Mccarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 2010; 26:139–140 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc 1995; 57:289–300
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:e45 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M et al. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 2005; 21:3674–3676 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Bosch BJ, van der Zee R, de Haan CA, Rottier PJ. The coronavirus spike protein is a class I virus fusion protein: structural and functional characterization of the fusion core complex. J Virol 2003; 77:8801–8811 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Linz LB, Liu S, Chougule NP, Bonning BC. In vitro evidence supports membrane alanyl aminopeptidase N as a receptor for a plant virus in the pea aphid vector. J Virol 2015; 89:11203–11212 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Otto GA, Lukavsky PJ, Lancaster AM, Sarnow P, Puglisi JD. Ribosomal proteins mediate the hepatitis C virus IRES–HeLa 40S interaction. RNA 2002; 8:913–923 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Hafrén A, Eskelin K, Mäkinen K. Ribosomal protein P0 promotes Potato virus A infection and functions in viral translation together with VPg and eIF(iso)4E. J Virol 2013; 87:4302–4312 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Guise AJ, Budayeva HG, Diner BA, Cristea IM. Histone deacetylases in herpesvirus replication and virus-stimulated host defense. Viruses 2013; 5:1607–1632 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Johnston JB, Wang G, Barrett JW, Nazarian SH, Colwill K et al. Myxoma virus M-T5 protects infected cells from the stress of cell cycle arrest through its interaction with host cell cullin-1. J Virol 2005; 79:10750–10763 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Kristie TM, Vogel JL, Sears AE. Nuclear localization of the C1 factor (host cell factor) in sensory neurons correlates with reactivation of herpes simplex virus from latency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:1229–1233 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Walter BL, Parsley TB, Ehrenfeld E, Semler BL. Distinct poly(rC) binding protein KH domain determinants for poliovirus translation initiation and viral RNA replication. J Virol 2002; 76:12008–12022 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Jang CY, Kim HD, Kim J. Ribosomal protein S3 interacts with TRADD to induce apoptosis through caspase dependent JNK activation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2012; 421:474–478 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Jang CY, Lee JY, Kim J. RpS3, a DNA repair endonuclease and ribosomal protein, is involved in apoptosis. FEBS Lett 2004; 560:81–85 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Imazu T, Shimizu S, Tagami S, Matsushima M, Nakamura Y et al. Bcl-2/E1B 19 kDa-interacting protein 3-like protein (Bnip3L) interacts with bcl-2/Bcl-xL and induces apoptosis by altering mitochondrial membrane permeability. Oncogene 1999; 18:4523–4529 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Devireddy LR, Green MR. Transcriptional program of apoptosis induction following interleukin 2 deprivation: identification of RC3, a calcium/calmodulin binding protein, as a novel proapoptotic factor. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:4532–4541 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Michallet MC, Saltel F, Preville X, Flacher M, Revillard JP et al. Cathepsin-B-dependent apoptosis triggered by antithymocyte globulins: a novel mechanism of T-cell depletion. Blood 2003; 102:3719–3726 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Sandes E, Lodillinsky C, Cwirenbaum R, Argüelles C, Casabé A et al. Cathepsin B is involved in the apoptosis intrinsic pathway induced by Bacillus Calmette-Guérin in transitional cancer cell lines. Int J Mol Med 2007; 20:823–828[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Samejima K, Earnshaw WC. Trashing the genome: the role of nucleases during apoptosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6:677–688 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Tarze A, Deniaud A, Le Bras M, Maillier E, Molle D et al. GAPDH, a novel regulator of the pro-apoptotic mitochondrial membrane permeabilization. Oncogene 2007; 26:2606–2620 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Cross TG, Scheel-Toellner D, Henriquez NV, Deacon E, Salmon M et al. Serine/threonine protein kinases and apoptosis. Exp Cell Res 2000; 256:34–41 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Canman CE, Kastan MB. Induction of apoptosis by tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Semin Cancer Biol 1995; 6:17–25 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Ryu JS, Kang SJ, Koo HS. The 53BP1 homolog in C. elegans influences DNA repair and promotes apoptosis in response to ionizing radiation. PLoS One 2013; 8:e64028 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Lin YF, Tsai WP, Liu HG, Liang PH. Intracellular β-tubulin/chaperonin containing TCP1-β complex serves as a novel chemotherapeutic target against drug-resistant tumors. Cancer Res 2009; 69:6879–6888 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Eytan E, Ganoth D, Armon T, Hershko A. ATP-dependent incorporation of 20S protease into the 26S complex that degrades proteins conjugated to ubiquitin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1989; 86:7751–7755 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Goldberg AL, Stein R, Adams J. New insights into proteasome function: from archaebacteria to drug development. Chem Biol 1995; 2:503–508 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Hedstrom L. Serine protease mechanism and specificity. Chem Rev 2002; 102:4501–4524 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Ardley HC, Robinson PA. E3 ubiquitin ligases. Essays Biochem 2005; 41:15–30 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Duan S, Cermak L, Pagan JK, Rossi M, Martinengo C et al. FBXO11 targets BCL6 for degradation and is inactivated in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Nature 2012; 481:90–93 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu Rev Biochem 1996; 65:801–847 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Robinson JM, Vandré DD. Stimulus-dependent alterations in macrophage microtubules: increased tubulin polymerization and detyrosination. J Cell Sci 1995; 108:645–655[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Gardai SJ, Mcphillips KA, Frasch SC, Janssen WJ, Starefeldt A et al. Cell-surface calreticulin initiates clearance of viable or apoptotic cells through trans-activation of LRP on the phagocyte. Cell 2005; 123:321–334 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Cantz M, Ulrich-Bott B. Disorders of glycoprotein degradation. J Inherit Metab Dis 1990; 13:523–537 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Jones MZ, Dawson G. Caprine beta-mannosidosis. inherited deficiency of beta-D-mannosidase. J Biol Chem 1981; 256:5185–5188[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Kakugawa S, Shimojima M, Goto H, Horimoto T, Oshimori N et al. Mitogen-activated protein kinase-activated kinase RSK2 plays a role in innate immune responses to influenza virus infection. J Virol 2009; 83:2510–2517 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Wada T, Penninger JM. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in apoptosis regulation. Oncogene 2004; 23:2838–2849 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Zou Z, Evans JD, Lu Z, Zhao P, Williams M et al. Comparative genomic analysis of the Tribolium immune system. Genome Biol 2007; 8:R177 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Sackton TB, Lazzaro BP, Schlenke TA, Evans JD, Hultmark D et al. Dynamic evolution of the innate immune system in Drosophila. Nat Genet 2007; 39:1461–1468 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Robinson KS, Clements A, Williams AC, Berger CN, Frankel G et al. Bax inhibitor 1 in apoptosis and disease. Oncogene 2011; 30:2391–2400 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Kakimura J, Kitamura Y, Takata K, Umeki M, Suzuki S et al. Microglial activation and amyloid-β clearance induced by exogenous heat-shock proteins. Faseb J 2002; 16:601–603[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Kono H, Rock KL. How dying cells alert the immune system to danger. Nat Rev Immunol 2008; 8:279–289 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Klowden MJ. Physiological Systems in Insects, 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic press; 2007
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Kawooya JK, Law JH. Role of lipophorin in lipid transport to the insect egg. J Biol Chem 1988; 263:8748–8753[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Kulakosky PC, Telfer WH. Lipophorin as a yolk precursor in Hyalophora cecropia: uptake kinetics and competition with vitellogenin. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 1990; 14:269–285 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Hinds PW, Mittnacht S, Dulic V, Arnold A, Reed SI et al. Regulation of retinoblastoma protein functions by ectopic expression of human cyclins cell; 1992; 70993–1006
  109. Wright JW, Copenhaver PF. Different isoforms of fasciclin II play distinct roles in the guidance of neuronal migration during insect embryogenesis. Dev Biol 2000; 225:59–78 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000874
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/jgv.0.000874
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary File 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error