1887

Abstract

Exposure to interferon results in the rapid transcriptional induction of genes, many of which function to create an antiviral environment in potential host cells. For the majority of adenoviruses, replication is unaffected by the actions of interferon. It has previously been shown, using non-gastrointestinal cells, that the species F human adenoviruses are sensitive to the action of interferon. Here, we have developed an enterocyte-like cell-culture model to re-evaluate this question, and determined the effects of interferon on species F adenovirus during infection of gastrointestinal cells. We show that species F adenovirus type 40 is sensitive to the effects of interferon in gastrointestinal-like cells, which may help to explain its fastidious growth in culture.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.037556-0
2012-03-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/93/3/618.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.037556-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Albinsson B., Kidd A. H. 1999; Adenovirus type 41 lacks an RGD αv-integrin binding motif on the penton base and undergoes delayed uptake in A549 cells. Virus Res 64:125–136 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson K. P., Fennie E. H. 1987; Adenovirus early region 1A modulation of interferon antiviral activity. J Virol 61:787–795[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Breese E. J., Michie C. A., Nicholls S. W., Murch S. H., Williams C. B., Domizio P., Walker-Smith J. A., MacDonald T. T. 1994; Tumor necrosis factor alpha-producing cells in the intestinal mucosa of children with inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 106:1455–1466[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown M., Wilson-Friesen H. L., Doane F. 1992; A block in release of progeny virus and a high particle-to-infectious unit ratio contribute to poor growth of enteric adenovirus types 40 and 41 in cell culture. J Virol 66:3198–3205[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chang K. O., Sosnovtsev S. V., Belliot G., Kim Y., Saif L. J., Green K. Y. 2004; Bile acids are essential for porcine enteric calicivirus replication in association with down-regulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:8733–8738 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Ducatelle R., Coussement W., Hoorens J. 1982; Sequential pathological study of experimental porcine adenovirus enteritis. Vet Pathol 19:179–189 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Duizer E., Schwab K. J., Neill F. H., Atmar R. L., Koopmans M. P., Estes M. K. 2004; Laboratory efforts to cultivate noroviruses. J Gen Virol 85:79–87 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Friedman E. A., Higgins P. J., Lipkin M., Shinya H., Gelb A. M. 1981; Tissue culture of human epithelial cells from benign colonic tumors. In Vitro 17:632–644 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gallagher J. G., Khoobyarian N. 1972; Adenovirus susceptibility to human interferon during one-step replication. Infect Immun 5:905–908[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Halleux C., Schneider Y. J. 1994; Iron absorption by CaCo 2 cells cultivated in serum-free medium as in vitro model of the human intestinal epithelial barrier. J Cell Physiol 158:17–28 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hidalgo I. J., Raub T. J., Borchardt R. T. 1989; Characterization of the human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology 96:736–749[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Leung T. K., Brown M. 2011; Block in entry of enteric adenovirus type 41 in HEK293 cells. Virus Res 156:54–63 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Lin H. C., Kao C. L., Lu C. Y., Lee C. N., Chiu T. F., Lee P. I., Tseng H. Y., Hsu H. L., Lee C. Y., Huang L. M. 2000; Enteric adenovirus infection in children in Taipei. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 33:176–180[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin-Latil S., Cotte-Laffitte J., Beau I., Quéro A. M., Géniteau-Legendre M., Servin A. L. 2004; A cyclic AMP protein kinase A-dependent mechanism by which rotavirus impairs the expression and enzyme activity of brush border-associated sucrase-isomaltase in differentiated intestinal Caco-2 cells. Cell Microbiol 6:719–731 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Mellits K. H., Hay R. T., Goodbourn S. 1993; Proteolytic degradation of MAD3 (IκB alpha) and enhanced processing of the NF-κB precursor p105 are obligatory steps in the activation of NF-κB. Nucleic Acids Res 21:5059–5066 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Phillips A. D. 1981; Small intestinal mucosa in childhood in health and disease. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 70:65–85[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Pintó R. M., Diez J. M., Bosch A. 1994; Use of the colonic carcinoma cell line CaCo-2 for in vivo amplification and detection of enteric viruses. J Med Virol 44:310–315 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Randall R. E., Goodbourn S. 2008; Interferons and viruses: an interplay between induction, signalling, antiviral responses and virus countermeasures. J Gen Virol 89:1–47 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Richard J. F., Mainguy G., Gibert M., Marvaud J. C., Stiles B. G., Popoff M. R. 2002; Transcytosis of iota-toxin across polarized CaCo-2 cells. Mol Microbiol 43:907–917 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Saderi H., Roustai M. H., Sabahi F. 2000; Antibodies to enteric adenoviruses (Ad40 and Ad41) in sera from Iranian children. J Clin Virol 16:145–147 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Sherwood V., Burgert H. G., Chen Y. H., Sanghera S., Katafigiotis S., Randall R. E., Connerton I., Mellits K. H. 2007; Improved growth of enteric adenovirus type 40 in a modified cell line that can no longer respond to interferon stimulation. J Gen Virol 88:71–76 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Slatter M. A., Read S., Taylor C. E., Crooks B. N., Abinun M., Flood T. J., Cant A. J., Wright C., Gennery A. R. 2005; Adenovirus type F subtype 41 causing disseminated disease following bone marrow transplantation for immunodeficiency. J Clin Microbiol 43:1462–1464 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tiemessen C. T., Kidd A. H. 1993; Sensitivity of subgroup F adenoviruses to interferon. Arch Virol 128:1–13 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Uhnoo I., Wadell G., Svensson L., Johansson M. E. 1984; Importance of enteric adenoviruses 40 and 41 in acute gastroenteritis in infants and young children. J Clin Microbiol 20:365–372[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Vachon P. H., Beaulieu J. F. 1992; Transient mosaic patterns of morphological and functional differentiation in the Caco-2 cell line. Gastroenterology 103:414–423[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Walters R. W., Freimuth P., Moninger T. O., Ganske I., Zabner J., Welsh M. J. 2002; Adenovirus fiber disrupts CAR-mediated intercellular adhesion allowing virus escape. Cell 110:789–799 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Whitelaw A., Davies H., Parry J. 1977; Electron microscopy of fatal adenovirus gastroenteritis. Lancet 309:361 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Wilhelmi I., Roman E., Sánchez-Fauquier A. 2003; Viruses causing gastroenteritis. Clin Microbiol Infect 9:247–262 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Witt D. J., Bousquet E. B. 1988; Comparison of enteric adenovirus infection in various human cell lines. J Virol Methods 20:295–308 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Yamasaki S., Miura Y., Brown E., Davydova J., Yamamoto M. 2010; Development of a method for effective amplification of human adenovirus 40. Arch Virol 155:1059–1068 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.037556-0
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/vir.0.037556-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error