1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Incubation with antiserum to chick embryo (CE) cells, in the presence of complement, inactivates Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) produced by heterokaryons formed by non-permissive RSV-transformed hamster cells and CE cells as well as RSV produced by CE cells. No inactivation of RSV produced by heterokaryons is observed following incubation with antiserum to the transformed hamster cells, plus complement. Hence, the envelope of RSV activated in heterokaryons, as that of RSV produced by CE cells, must contain a surface antigen of the CE cell, and the virus must mature only, or preferentially, at chicken-specific sites of the heterokaryon surface.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-28-2-265
1975-08-01
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/28/2/JV0280020265.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-28-2-265&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Aupoix M., Vigier P. 1975; Evidence for a host cell surface antigen on the envelope of avian tumor viruses. Journal of General Virology 27:151–162
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Hanahjsa H. 1969; Rapid transformation of cells by Rous sarcoma virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 63:318–325
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Montagnier L., Vigier P. 1967; Transformation de cellules de hamster par deux souches, non défective et défective, de virus de Rous. Comptes Rendus de I’Academie des Sciences de Paris 264D:193–196
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Rubin H., Temin H. M. 1959; A radiological study of cell-virus interaction in the Rous sarcoma. Virology 7:75–91
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Svec J., Svec F., Simkovic D., Thurzo V. 1970; Induction of tumors in hamsters by rat Rous sarcoma RBI, producing chick sarcoma virus. I. Continuous production of virus oncogenic for chicks by hamster sarcoma cells. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 44:521–532
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Svoboda J. 1968; Dependence among RNA-containing animal viruses. In The Molecular Biology of Viruses pp 249–271 Edited by Crawford L. V., Stoker M. G. P. Cambridge: University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Temin H. M., Rubin H. 1959; A kinetic study of infection of chick embryo cells in vitro by Rous sarcoma virus. Virology 8:209–222
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Vigier P. 1967; Persistance du génome du virus de Rous dans des cellules de hamster converties in vitro par un virus non defectif et un virus defectif. Comptes Rendus de VAcademie des Sciences de Paris 262D:2554–2557
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Vigier P. 1973; Persistence of Rous sarcoma virus in transformed non-permissive cells: characteristics of virus induction following Sendai virus-mediated fusion with permissive cells. International Journal of Cancer 11:473–483
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Vigier P., Bataillon G. 1971; Persistence of Rous sarcoma virus in transformed non-permissive cells: relationship between virus induction by association with permissive cells and gs antigen content of transformed cells. Virology 45313–316
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-28-2-265
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-28-2-265
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error