An Electron Microscopic Study of the Infection of Isolated Tomato Fruit Protoplasts by Tobacco Mosaic Virus

References

1. Bagi G., Farkas G. L. 1967; On the nature of increase in ribonuclease activity in mechanically damaged tobacco leaf tissues. Phytochemistry 6:161
   [Google Scholar]
2. Brachet J. 1955; Further observations on the effects of ribonuclease on living root-tip cells. Biochim. biophys. Acta 16:611
   [Google Scholar]
3. Cocking E. C. 1966; An electron microscopic study of the initial stages of infection of isolated tomato fruit protoplasts by tobacco mosaic virus. Planta 68:206
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cocking E. C., Pojnar E. 1968a; A study of the infection of tomato fruit by tobacco mosaic virus. Phytopath. Z (in the Press)
   [Google Scholar]
5. Cocking E. C., Pojnar E. 1968b; Appearance of tobacco mosaic virus in thin section using different staining procedures. J. gen. Virol 2:317
   [Google Scholar]
6. Davies J. W., Cocking E. C. 1966; Liquid scintillation counting of ¹⁴C and ³H samples using glass-fibre or filter paper discs. Biochim. biophys. Acta 115:511
   [Google Scholar]
7. Glazer A. N., Wellner D. 1964; Adsorption of proteins on Sephadex. Nature, Lond 194:862
   [Google Scholar]
8. Hamers-Casterman C., Jeener R. 1957; An initial ribonuclease-sensitive phase in the multiplication of tobacco mosaic virus. Virology 3:197
   [Google Scholar]
9. Holmes I. H., Watson D. H. 1963; An electron microscope study of the attachment and penetration of herpes virus in BHK 21 cells. Virology 21:112
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kassanis B. 1967; Plant tissue culture. In Methods in Virology vol 1 Ed. by Maramorosch K. and Koprowski. H. New York and London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
11. Lamport D. T. A. 1964; Cell suspension cultures of higher plants: isolation and growth energetics. Expl Cell Res 33:195
    [Google Scholar]
12. Matthaei H., Kleinkauf H., Heller G., Voigt H. P., Matthaei H. 1967; An experimental analysis of the genetic code. In Heritage from Mendel ed. by Brink. R. A. Madison, Wisconsin and London: The University of Wisconsin Press;
    [Google Scholar]
13. Mayo M. A., Cocking E. C. 1968; Double staining of tobacco mosaic virus infected material using phosphotungstic acid and uranyl acetate during dehydration. J. gen. Virol 3:309
    [Google Scholar]
14. Mohr W., Cocking E. C. 1968; A method for preparing highly vacuolated, senescent and damaged plant tissue for ultrastructural study. J. Ultrastruct. Res 21:171
    [Google Scholar]
15. Mundry K. W. 1963; Plant virus–host cell relations. A. Rev. Phytopath 1:173
    [Google Scholar]
16. Mundry K. W. 1965; Interactions between plant viruses and host cells. In Reproduction: Molecular, Subcellular and Cellular 24th Symp. Soc. for Developmental Biology New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
17. Pojnar E., Willison J. H. M., Cocking E. C. 1967; Cell-wall regeneration by isolated tomato-fruit protoplasts. Protoplasma 64:460
    [Google Scholar]
18. Reynolds E. S. 1963; The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J cell. Biol 17:208
    [Google Scholar]
19. Séchaud J., Ryter A., Kellenberger E. 1959; Considerations quantitatives sur des coupes ultraminces de bactéries infectées par un bacteriophage. J. biophys. biochem. Cytol 5:469
    [Google Scholar]
20. Siegel A. 1966; The first stages of infection. In Viruses of Plants ed. by Beemster A. B. R., Dijkstra. J. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company;
    [Google Scholar]
21. Takebe I., Otsuki Y., Aoki S. 1968; Isolation of tobacco mesophyll cells in intact and active state. Pl. CellPhysiol., Tokyo 9:115
    [Google Scholar]