1887

Abstract

SUMMARY

Inhibitors of glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation, protein synthesis, membrane Na-K transport and microfilament and microtubule function have been employed to elucidate the mechanism of influenza virus uptake by CAM and CEF cells. Electron microscopy demonstrated uptake of virus by viropexis in the presence of all these inhibitors. Utilizing a pulse labelling technique, virus entering CEF cells in the presence of inhibitors was shown to initiate specific virus polypeptide synthesis after neutralization of remaining extracellular virus and removal of the inhibitors. As a consequence of these findings an energy independent mechanism of viropexis has been proposed.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-43-1-223
1979-04-01
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/43/1/JV0430010223.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-43-1-223&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Allison A. C. 1973 In Locomotion of Tissue Cells pp 109–143 Ciba Foundation Symposium. Amsterdam Excerpta Medica
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bächi T. 1970; Electronmicroscopische Untersuchungen über den Infectionszyklus von Influenza A-viren in Ehrlich-Aszites-Tumor-Zellen. Pathologia et Microbiologia 36:81–107
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chardonnet Y., Dales S. 1970; Early events in the interaction of adenoviruses with HeLa cells. II. Comparative observations on the penetration of types 1, 5, 7 and 12. Virology 40:478–485
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cooper D., Banthorpe D. U., Wilkie D. 1967; Modified ribosomes conferring resistance to cycloheximide in mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Molecular Biology 26:347–349
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Cramble J. L. 1957; K+ binding and oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria and mitochondrial membrane fragments. Journal of Biological Chemistry 228:955–967
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dales S. 1973; Early events in cell-animal virus interactions. Bacteriological Reviews 37:103–135
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dales S., Pons M. W. 1976; Penetration of influenza examined by means of virus aggregates. Virology 69:278–286
    [Google Scholar]
  8. D’onofrio C., Paradisi F., Piccolo D. 1977; The influence of some metabolic inhibitors on in vitro phagocytizing macrophages. Medical Microbiology and Immunobiology 163:195–207
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Dourmashkin R. R., Tyrrell D. A. J. 1974; Electron microscopic observations of the entry of influenza virus into susceptible cells. Journal of General Virology 24:129–141
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldman R. G., Berg G., Bushnell A., Chang C. Dickerman, Hopkins N., Miller M. L., Pollack R., Wong E. 1973 In Locomotion of Tissue Cells pp 83–103 Ciba Foundation Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica;
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hackemann M. M. A., Denman A. M., Tyrrell D. A. J. 1974; Inactivation of influenza virus by human lymphocytes. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 16:583–591
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Haywood A. M. 1975; ‘Phagocytosis’ of Sendai virus by model membranes. Journal of General Virology 29:63–68
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hewitt J. A. 1977; On the influence of polyvalent ligands on membrane curvature. Journal of Theoretical Biology 64:455–472
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Hotchkiss R. D. 1944; Gramicidin, tyrocidine and tyrothricin. Advances in Enzymology 4:153–199
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucy J. A. 1970; The fusion of biological membranes. Nature, London 227:815–817
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Luft J. H. 1971; Ruthenium red and violet. I. Chemistry, purification, methods of use for electron microscopy and mechanism of action. Anatomical Record 171:347–368
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oxford J. S., Mcgeoch D. J., Schild G. C., Beare A. S. 1978; Analysis of virion RNA segments and polypeptides of influenza A virus recombinants of defined virulence. Nature, London 273:778–779
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Patterson S., Bingham R. W. 1976; Electron microscope observations on the entry of avian infectious bronchitis virus into susceptible cells. Archives of Virology 52:191–200
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Philipson L., Everitt E., Lonberg-Holm K. 1976 In Cell Membrane Receptors for Viruses, Antigens and Antibodies, Polypeptide Hormones and Small Molecules pp 203–216 Edited by Beers R. F., Bassett E. G. New York: Raven Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Singer S. J., Nioolson G. L. 1972; The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science 17s:720–731
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Steinman R. M., Silver J. M., Cohn Z. A. 1974; Pinocytosis in fibroblasts Quantitative studies in vitro. Journal of Cell Biology 63:949–969
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Stephenson J. R., Dimmock N. J. 1975; Early events in influenza virus multiplication. I. Location and fate of input RNA. Virology 65:77–86
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Taylor R. B., Duffus P. H., Raff M. C., De Petris S. 1971; Redistribution and pinocytosis of lymphocyte surface immunoglobulin molecules induced by anti-immunoglobulin antibody. Nature New Biology 233:225–229
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Webb J. L. 1966 In Enzyme and Metabolic Inhibitors pp 383–403 London: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Weisenberg R. C., Timasheff S. N. 1970; Aggregation of microtubule subunit protein: the effects of divalent cations, colchicine and vinblastine. Biochemistry 9:4110–4116
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wessells N. K., Spooner D. S., Ash J. F., Bradley M. O., Luduena M. A., Taylor E. L., Wrenn J. T., Yamada K. M. 1971; Microfilaments in cellular and developmental processes. Science 171:135–143
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Wills E. J., Davies P., Allison A. C., Haswell A. D. 1972; Cytochalasin B fails to inhibit pinocytosis by macrophages. Nature New Biology 240:58–60
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-43-1-223
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-43-1-223
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error