1887

Abstract

We examined the capability of pseudorabies virus (PRV) to replicate in porcine peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and characterized the phenotype of infected cells. In addition, we investigated whether inactivation of various PRV proteins or the expression of a foreign gene affected this replication. Finally, we studied the replication of PRV strains in concanavalin A (Con A)-stimulated lymphocytes. The replication of PRV mutants with inactivated glycoproteins gE or gG, thymidine kinase (TK), ribonucleotide reductase (RR) or US3-encoded protein kinase (PK), and the replication of PRV vector strains expressing the envelope glycoprotein E1 of hog cholera virus (HCV) were studied. By adherence of PBMC to plastic, monocytes and lymphocytes were largely separated. Infected monocytes were analysed with an immunostaining monolayer assay and infected lymphocytes were analysed with immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometry. We found that the wild-type NIA-3 virus replicated in both lymphocyte and monocyte cultures. NIA-3 infected relatively more monocytes (> 90%) than non-adherent B cells (46–65%) and T cells (17–28%); approximately equal numbers of CD4 and CD8 T cells were infected. Although E1 is probably involved in adsorption of HCV to host cells, the expression of E1 by PRV vector strains did not change the level of replication. Inactivation of TK and RR, but not inactivation of gE, gG or PK, severely affected the replication in both monocytes and lymphocytes. Con A stimulation of lymphocytes restored the reduced replication of the TK mutant, but not of the RR mutant. Moreover, Con A stimulation of lymphocytes reduced the replication of the wild-type NIA-3 virus. We concluded that both viral TK and RR activity are important for efficient replication of PRV in resting lymphocytes. Furthermore, Con A-stimulated lymphocytes can restore the viral TK defect and PRV replication can also be influenced by cellular metabolism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-6-1433
1995-06-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jgv/76/6/JV0760061433.html?itemId=/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-6-1433&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Bouyyad A., Menezes J. 1990; Comparative study of herpes simplex virus receptor expression on human lymphoid cells. Virology 179:905–910
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Brandt C. R., Kintner R. L., Pumfery A. M., Visalli R. J., Grau D. R. 1991; The herpes simplex virus ribonucleotide reductase is required for ocular virulence. Journal of General Virology 72:2043–2049
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chinsakchai S., Molitor T. W. 1992; Replication and immunosuppressive effects of PRV on swine peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 30:247–260
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Daikoku T., Yamamoto N., Maeno K., Nishiyama Y. 1991; Role of viral ribonucleotide reductase in the increase of dTTP pool size in herpes simplex virus-infected Vero cells. Journal of General Virology 72:1441–1444
    [Google Scholar]
  5. De Wind N., Zijderveld A., Glazenburg K., Gielkens A., Berns A. 1990; Linker insertion mutagenesis of herpesviruses: inactivation of single genes within the Us region of pseudorabies virus. Journal of Virology 64:4691–4696
    [Google Scholar]
  6. De Wind N., Berns A., Gielkens A., Kimman T. 1993; Ribonucleotide reductase-deficient mutants of pseudorabies virus are avirulent for pigs and induce partial protective immunity. Journal of General Virology 74:351–359
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Dow C., McFerran J. B. 1962; The neuropathology of Aujeszky’s disease in the pig. Research in Veterinary Sciences 3:436–442
    [Google Scholar]
  8. El-Awar F. Y., Hahn E. C. 1987; Swine antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against pseudorabies virus-infected cells. American Journal of Veterinary Research 48:481–485
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Goldstein D. J., Weller S. K. 1988a; Herpes simplex virus type 1-induced ribonucleotide reductase activity is dispensable for virus growth and DNA synthesis: isolation and characterization of an ICP6 lacZ insertion mutant. Journal of Virology 62:196–205
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goldstein D. J., Weller S. K. 1988b; Factor(s) present in herpes simplex virus type-1 infected cells can compensate for the loss of the large subunit of the viral ribonucleotide reductase: characterization of an ICP6 deletion mutant. Virology 166:41–51
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gustafson D. P. 1986; Pseudorabies. In Diseases of Swine pp 274–289 Edited by Leman A. D., Straw B., Glock R. D., Mengeling W. L., Penny R. H. C., Scholl E. Ames: Iowa State University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Hammerberg C., Schuring G. 1986; Characterization of monoclonal antibodies directed against swine lymphocytes. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 11:107–121
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hennis Y. I. 1994; Role of viral glycoprotein mobility in Sendai virus-mediated cell fusion. In Viral Fusion Mechanisms pp 335–361 Edited by Bentz J. Boca Raton: CRC Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Iglesias G., Pijoan C., Molitor T. 1989; Interactions of pseudorabies virus with swine alveolar macrophages: effects of virus infection on cell functions. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 45:410–415
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Ito M., Barron A. L. 1974; Inactivation of herpes simplex virus by concanavalin A. Journal of Virology 13:1312–1318
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Jacobs L. 1994; Glycoprotein I of pseudorabies virus (Aujeszky’s disease virus; suid herpesvirus-1) and homologous proteins in other alphaherpesvirinae: a brief review. Archives of Virology 137:209–228
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Jacobs L., Mulder W. A. M., van Oirschot J. T., Gielkens A. L. J., Kimman T. G. 1993; Deleting two amino acids in glycoprotein gl of pseudorabies virus decreases virulence and neurotropism for pigs, but does not affect immunogenicity. Journal of General Virology 74:2201–2206
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Jacobson J. G., Leib D. A., Goldstein D. J., Bogard C. L., Schaffer P. A., Weller S. K., Coen D. M. 1989; A herpes simplex virus ribonucleotide reductase deletion mutant is defective for productive acute and reactivatable latent infections of mice and for replication in mouse cells. Virology 173:276–283
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jamieson A. T., Gentry G. A., Subak-Sharpe J. H. 1974; Induction of both thymidine and deoxycytidine kinase activity by herpes viruses. Journal of General Virology 24:465–480
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Jonjic S., Koszinowski U. H. 1984; Monoclonal antibodies reactive with swine lymphocytes. I. Antibodies to membrane structures that define a cytolytic T lymphocyte subset in swine. Journal of Immunology 133:647–652
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kasza L., Shadduck J. A., Christofinis G. J. 1971; Establishment, viral susceptibility, and biological characteristics of a swine kidney cell line SK-6. Research in Veterinary Sciences 13:46–51
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kimman T. G., de Wind N., Oei-Lie N., Pol J. M. A., Berns A. J. M., Gielkens A. L. J. 1992; Contribution of single genes within the unique short region of Aujeszky’s disease virus (suid herpesvirus type 1) to virulence, pathogenesis and immunogenicity. Journal of General Virology 73:243–251
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Kimman T. G., Bianchi A. T. J., De Bruin T. G. M., Mulder W. A. M., Priem J., Voermans J. J. M. 1994; Interaction of pseudorabies virus with immortalized porcine B cells: influence on surface class I and class II major histocompatibility complex and immunoglobulin M expression. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology (in press)
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kritas S. K., Pensaert M. B., Mettenleiter T. C. 1994a; Invasion and spread of single glycoprotein deleted mutants of Aujeszky’s disease virus (ADV) in the trigeminal nervous pathways of pigs after intranasal inoculation. Veterinary Microbiology 40:323–334
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kritas S. K., Pensaert M. B., Mettenleiter T. C. 1994b; Role of envelope glycoproteins gl, gp63 and gill in the invasion and spread of Aujeszky’s disease virus in the olfactory nervous pathway of the pig. Journal of General Virology 75:2319–2327
    [Google Scholar]
  26. McFerran J. B., Dow C. 1975; Studies on immunisation of pigs with the Bartha strain of Aujeszky’s disease virus. Research in Veterinary Sciences 19:17–22
    [Google Scholar]
  27. McGregor S., Easterday B. C., Kaplan A. S., Ben-Porat T. 1985; Vaccination of swine with thymidine kinase-deficient mutants of pseudorabies virus. American Journal of Veterinary Research 46:1494–1497
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Moormann R. J. M., de Rover T., Briaire J., Peeters B. P. H., Gielkens A. L. J., van Oirschot J. T. 1990; Inactivation of the thymidine kinase gene of a gI deletion mutant of pseudorabies virus generates a safe but highly immunogenic vaccine strain. Journal of General Virology 71:1591–1595
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mulder W. A. M., Priem J., Glazenburg K. L., Wagenaar F., Gruys E., Gielkens A. L. J., Pol J. M. A., Kimman T. G. 1994a; Virulence and pathogenesis of non-virulent and virulent strains of pseudorabies virus expressing envelope glycoprotein E1 of hog cholera virus. Journal of General Virology 75:117–124
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mulder W. A. M., Jacobs L., Priem J., Kok G. L., Wagenaar F., Kimman T. G., Pol J. M. A. 1994b; Glycoprotein gE-negative pseudorabies virus has a reduced capability to infect second- and third-order neurons of the olfactory and trigeminal routes in the porcine central nervous system. Journal of General Virology 75:3095–3106
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nauwynck H. J., Pensaert M. B. 1992; Abortion induced by cell-associated pseudorabies virus in vaccinated sows. American Journal of Veterinary Research 53:489–493
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Okada Y., Kim J. 1972; Interaction of concanavalin A with enveloped viruses and host cells. Virology 50:507–515
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Page G. R., Wang F., Hahn E. C. 1992; Interaction of pseudorabies virus with porcine peripheral blood lymphocytes. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 52:441–148
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Pescovitz M. D., Lunney J. K., Sachs D. H. 1984; Preparation and characterisation of monoclonal antibodies reactive with porcine PBL. Journal of Immunology 133:368–375
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Pol J. M. A., Gielkens A. L. J., van Oirschot J. T. 1989; Comparative pathogenesis of three strains of pseudorabies virus in pigs. Microbial Pathogenesis 7:361–371
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pol J. M. A., Quint W. G. V., Kok G. L., Broekhuysen-Davies J. M. 1991; Pseudorabies virus infections in explants of porcine nasal mucosa. Research in Veterinary Sciences 50:45–53
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Preston V. G., Darling A. J., McDougall I. M. 1988; The herpes simplex virus type 1 temperature-sensitive mutant tsl222 has a single base pair deletion in the small subunit of ribonucleotide reductase. Virology 167:458–167
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reichard P. 1988; Interactions between deoxyribonucleotide and DNA synthesis. Annual Review of Biochemistry 57:349–374
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Roit I. V., Brostoff J., Male D. K. 1987 Immunology chapter 2, p. 5 London: Gower Medical Publishing;
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Sachs D. H., Leight G., Cone J., Schwarz S., Stuart L. 1976; Transplantation in miniature swine. I. Fixation of the major histocompability complex. Transplantation 22:559–566
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sarmiento M., Kleinerman E. S. 1990; Innate resistance to herpes simplex virus infection. Human lymphocyte and monocyte inhibition of viral replication. Journal of Immunology 144:1942–1953
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Summer J. B., Howell S. F. 1936; The identification of the haemagglutinin of the jack bean with concanavalin A. Journal of Bacteriology 32:227–237
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Thomsen D. R., Marchiolo C. G., Yancey R. J., Post L. E. 1987; Replication and virulence of pseudorabies virus mutants lacking glycoprotein gX. Journal of Virology 61:229–232
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Van Oirschot J. T. 1979; Experimental production of congenital persistent swine fever infections. I. Clinical, pathological and virological observations. Veterinary Microbiology 8:117–132
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Van Oirschot J. T. 1983; Congenital infections with non-arbo togaviruses. Veterinary Microbiology 8:321–361
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Van Zaane D., Hulst M. 1987; Monoclonal antibodies against porcine immunoglobulin isotypes. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 16:23–26
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Van Zijl M., Wensvoort G., De Kluyver E., Hulst M., Van Der Gulden H., Gielkens A., Berns A., Moormann R. 1991; Live attenuated pseudorabies virus expressing envelope glycoprotein E1 of hog cholera virus protects swine both against pseudorabies and hog cholera. Journal of Virology 65:2761–2765
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang F., Pang V. F., Hahn E. C. 1988; Flow cytometric analysis of porcine peripheral blood leucocytes infected with pseudorabies virus. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 43:256–264
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Wittels M., Spear P. G. 1990; Penetration of cells by herpes simplex virus does not require a low pH-dependent endocytotic pathway. Virus Research 18:271–290
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Wittmann G., Jakubik J., Ahl R. 1980; Multiplication and distribution of Aujeszky’s disease virus in vaccinated and non-vaccinated pigs after intranasal infection. Archives of Virology 66:221–240
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Zhang G., Stevens R., Leader D. P. 1990; The protein kinase encoded in the short region of pseudorabies virus: description of the gene and identification of its product in virions and infected cells. Journal of General Virology 64:802–812
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Ziegler R. J., Pozos R. S. 1981; Effects of lectins on peripheral infection by herpes simplex virus of rat sensory neurons in culture. Infection and Immunity 34:588–595
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-6-1433
Loading
/content/journal/jgv/10.1099/0022-1317-76-6-1433
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error